Authored By Ty Bollinger,

Posted November 14, 2019 by Derek Knauss



How receptive are most oncologists to using alternative cancer therapies for their patients?
Not surprisingly, most medical practitioners are  apprehensive to their patients utilizing cancer treatments that are not considered “standard of care.”
But not for the reasons you may think… which will be explained later in this article.
Most physicians interviewed in Dr. Ivy Lynn Bourgeault’s (from the Canada Medical Association) research said they opposed the use of alternative cancer therapies for their patients.
Yet, according to Dr. Bourgeault, “54% of people with cancer use alternative therapies and up to half of those patients completely abandon standard medical treatments in exchange for alternative methods.”
Some alternative cancer treatments include:
  • Acupuncture
  • Traditional Chinese medicine
  • Homeopathy
  • Naturopathic medicine
  • Specific diets (such as low-fat or juicing diets)
  • Vitamins
  • Energy therapies
  • But the question remains… if standard medical methods were working, why are more than HALF of cancer patients turning to alternative medicine for healing? It has to be due to the failure of conventional cancer treatments, or at least ineffective in the eyes of the patients. [ Cassileth BR, Brown H. Unorthodox cancer medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 1988; 38:176-86 ]In a survey of cancer patients, 39% reported that their doctors reacted with disapproval concerning their request for alternative therapy and 4% refused to continue as their physician because they chose natural medicine.Still, in that same survey, it was reported that 30% of oncologists supported the use of alternative cancer treatments, while 12% were neutral.It is unnerving to discover that some doctors refuse to consider alternative cancer treatments when their patients clearly want to discuss and pursue those options.Interestingly enough, most physicians report being opposed to the alternatives  by reason of insufficient knowledge, not because they’re ineffective.
    However, 83% of the doctors surveyed reported that continuing education about alternative health services  was of interest…but the source of information was primarily from their patients, not from peers or medical research.
    A survey from Ontario and Alberta, Canada concluded with remarkable results; namely, 54% of practitioners felt conventional medicine could benefit from the concepts and methods of alternative medicine for the following reasons: most patients were not responding to conventional treatment, their patients requested it and admittedly, alternative medicine is proven effective in treating particular disorders.
    Finally, whether medical practitioners believe in alternative treatments or not, research supports the fact that patients find them helpful, even if it just increases their optimism.
    So the question is,… if doctors are open and willing to learn about alternative medicine to treat cancer, and their patients are turning to non-conventional cancer treatments…why isn’t more education recommended to oncologists?
    Two words: Flexner Report. Due to an alliance between the American Medical Association (AMA) and big business (the Rockefellers and Carnegies) over 100 years ago, the medical schools in the USA focus solely on prescription drugs for cancer treatment while actively turning people away from natural remedies.
    What Most Doctors REALLY Think About Alternative Cancer Treatments
     How can we counteract this policy?  One solution is to enthusiastically support the patient’s right of choice when it comes to their bodies, as long as all the  information has been presented and discussed openly between the doctor and patient. After all, this is still the “land of the free,” right?

    The research shows that there is clearly a need for more openness between doctors and their patients with regard to alternative cancer treatments.
    This is particularly important because many cancer patients are rejecting conventional treatments, sometimes permanently, in favor of alternative treatments.  Interestingly, according to a poll at McGill Cancer Centre, in a poll of 64 oncologists, 58 indicated that they would not utilize chemotherapy for themselves or their families, due to the fact that this archaic, barbaric form of treatment is “too toxic.”
    Long ago, medical doctors believed that draining an ailing person’s blood would purge the “evil” infection out of the body. And worse, medical doctors ignorantly recommended cigar
    What Most Doctors REALLY Think About Alternative Cancer Treatments
    ettes to their patients using the mantra, “a pack a day keeps lung cancer away.” Both of these ridiculous suggestions have been proven to be pure quackery, but they were widely accepted by the “medical establishment” of their day.

    Now is the time to openly discuss alternative cancer treatments as a real solution to conventional medicine.

Also by Ty Bollinger:
About the author:
Ty Bollinger
Ty Bollinger is a CPA, health freedom advocate, cancer researcher, former competitive bodybuilder and author. After losing several family members to cancer, he refused to accept the notion that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery were the most effective treatments available for cancer patients. He began a quest to learn all he possibly could about alternative cancer treatments and the medical industry. What he uncovered was shocking. There is ample evidence to support the allegation that the “war on cancer” is largely a fraud and that multinational pharmaceutical companies are “running the show.” Ty has now made it his life mission to share the most remarkable discovery he made on his quest: the vast majority of all diseases, including cancer, can be easily prevented and even cured without drugs or surgery.
For more information, visit:

Compiled by from: 
What Most Doctors REALLY Think About Alternative Cancer Treatments
UN expert’s call to stop Israeli settlement of Palestinian territories falls on deaf ears
Nature Restoration Group Newsletter – Introduction
Truth At Last: The Assassination of Martin Luther King
Benjamin Fulford 11/11/19 Update: Deliberate implosion of financial system being engineered to kick-start new financial system
Bolivian Coup Comes Less Than a Week After Morales Stopped Multinational Firm’s Lithium Deal
Meditation and Cannabis⁠— What’s the Connection?
Nature Restoration Group – On the Precipice of Change, Stepping into Planetary Stewardship
Compassionate Latitude: The need of the times
Short Story: The Truth About Apple Cider Vinegar
How to Increase Investments Through Events for Your Nonprofit
Coca-Cola Named Worst Plastic Polluter in the World for Second Year in a Row
Instead of Arresting the Homeless Population, City Paying Them to Pickup Trash
The Positive Impact Public benefit Corporations Can Have On Society
Autism Behind the Wheel: Teaching Teens and Young Adults with ASD to Drive
Bedouin mass eviction – Israel to drive Palestinians off their historic lands
The Amazing Cancer-Fighting Benefits of Curcumin
Cobra Update – Silver Trigger Final Update – 11/11
U.S. Debt Jumps $1 Trillion in 3 Months – Is the Economy Healthy?


No religious or political creed is advocated here.

Organised religion is unnecessary to spirituality.

Excellent teachings of the masters have been contaminated by the dogmatic control of these religions.

Discernment yes; judgement does not.
If you use discernment you are free to research with an open mind. 

With discernment it is possible to reach the spirit of the letter of any writing and it is also much easier to listen to the voice of the soul that comes from the heart.
Individually you can be helped to find your Truth that is different of everyone. 

Please respect all credits.

Discernment is recommended.

All articles are of the respective authors and/or publishers responsibility. 



Like this! please bookmark. It is updated daily


Free counters!



publicado por achama às 20:56